Распознанный текст (OCR Internet Archive), не вычитан. Лицензии
during the three defences I have mentioned, is to remain master of him. If he resists the attacks of the spurs, when he is stationary, I make him go forward at all hazards. I then close my legs, and begin again, until he yields. The point upon which I insist is, that we are always master of a horse when we can make him go forward.
These observations, of course, do not apply only to the piaffer and passage. My reason for having dwelt on this subject so long, is that the means I have mentioned are always the same which I use for combatting defences—always the same which the horse adopts when he is touched by the spur, while he is kept in one place.[1]
Men of the new school, of whom I had occasion to speak in the preceding chapter, employ, in order to teach the piaffer, means not less strange, though more brutal, than that which they use for teaching the Spanish walk. They open the door of the school, and place the horse, with his head turned to the side of the stable, close to the opening of this door, to make him impatient. One man is on his back, another holds the caveson, and a third stands behind the animal, with a driving whip in his hand.[2] They then put on each pastern a leather hobble, to which is attached a piece of wood in the shape of an egg.
When the horse moves a foot, or rather when he puts it down,
Many breakers, when alluding to horses which have got the better of them, say, in order to excuse themselves, that nothing can be done with animals which kick, rear, or run back each time they feel the spur. The truth is that their method is faulty! Sometimes they boast that they punished their horse so severely that he could not get up for several days, a statement which only proves their brutality. In the worst battle with a horse, I have never ill-treated him to such an extent as to bring him down. I have never even fatigued him so much as to make him unable to resume his work on the following day. ↩︎
These gentlemen only work all together—always several tormentors for one victim. Besides, they are so convinced that they cannot do otherwise, that they scoff at those who say that a breaker ought to ride his horse and break him without the help of anyone, a fact which appears to them to be simply impossible. ↩︎